Fill voids faster and build occupier and investor demand that does not depend on one agent's phone book.
What does a marketing agency for commercial property companies actually do?
Commercial property marketing generates occupier and investor demand for offices, industrial, retail and mixed-use assets. The work is requirement-led search visibility, asset-level campaign pages, targeted occupier outreach, and investor deal-flow marketing — measured on void days and letting velocity, not enquiries.
Reviewed by Kasim Javed · Last reviewed 17 August 2026
Empty units carry rates and service charge liability.
By size, spec and location, not by landlord brand.
Buyers and vendors need separate marketing from occupiers.
Commercial property marketing serves two very different audiences: occupiers looking for space and investors looking for assets. Combining them into one message serves neither.
Voids are expensive in a way residential is not — empty rates, service charge shortfall and dilapidation exposure make speed of letting a direct financial issue.
Occupier decisions run through several people over months. Marketing has to survive a committee, which means specification, cost certainty and fit-out detail must be available in writing.
Demand concentrated in a single agent's contacts means no owned pipeline and no leverage on fees or performance.
PDF particulars and dated photography for assets worth millions, when occupiers expect floorplans, video and fit-out visualisation.
Occupiers search by size and location; portfolios not built around those terms simply never appear.
MEES compliance and energy performance now decide shortlists for corporate occupiers, yet rarely feature in marketing.
One page trying to attract both a tenant and a buyer converts neither.
'office space [city] 5000 sq ft', 'industrial unit to let [town]' — the occupier's actual query pattern.
CoStar and similar platforms where agents and corporate acquisition teams begin.
Still central for larger requirements, and best treated as one channel among several.
Yield, tenant covenant and WAULT searches from private and institutional buyers.
We review your asset presentation, requirement-search visibility, occupier outreach and investor pipeline, then show you what fewer void days is worth across the portfolio.
A proper page per available unit with size, spec, floorplans, EPC, service charge, video tour and a named contact — indexable and shareable.
Search coverage by size band, use class and location so the portfolio appears the moment a requirement forms.
Targeted campaigns to businesses whose leases are expiring or whose growth implies a move, rather than waiting for enquiries.
EPC ratings, retrofit work and running costs presented clearly, because corporate occupiers now screen on them.
Deal-flow marketing with yield, covenant and WAULT detail for buyers, kept distinct from occupier messaging.
Time to let per asset and cost per letting, so marketing is measured against the actual financial cost of vacancy.
| Metric | What good looks like | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Void days per unit | Falling year on year | Direct cost to the asset. |
| Direct occupier enquiries | Tracked against agent-sourced | Shows whether you own any demand. |
| Enquiry to viewing rate | Measured per asset | Reveals weak particulars fast. |
| Cost per letting | Known, including agent fees | Makes channel comparison possible. |
| Investor list growth | Steady | Speeds up disposals when they come. |
Benchmarks differ sharply between industrial, office and retail, and by lot size.
Void history, letting sources, particulars quality and cost per letting.
Indexable asset pages, photography, floorplans and video.
Requirement-led search plus targeted outreach to likely movers.
Deal-flow marketing and a maintained buyer database.
Void days and cost per letting per asset, quarterly.
By marketing units before they become vacant, publishing proper asset pages that answer occupier questions, appearing on requirement search, and targeting businesses with expiring leases directly.
For most larger requirements, yes. But owning direct demand alongside agency representation improves speed, leverage and cost per letting.
By size, use class and location, then by cost certainty — rent, service charge, rates and fit-out. Marketing that hides those figures loses shortlist places.
Yes. Minimum standards constrain what can be let, and corporate occupiers increasingly screen on energy performance and running costs before viewing.
Always. An occupier cares about space, cost and timing; an investor cares about yield, covenant strength and lease length. One page cannot serve both.
Yes — market reports, rent and yield commentary and area guides build authority with both occupiers and investors, and they earn links that lift the whole portfolio.
Void days and cost per letting per asset. Enquiry counts do not reflect the financial impact of an empty unit.
commercial property companies compete locally, so visibility is won city by city. We work with commercial property companies nationwide — these are the markets we are asked about most.
We review your asset presentation, requirement-search visibility, occupier outreach and investor pipeline, then show you what fewer void days is worth across the portfolio.